Board Network, Capital Cost and Capital Structure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof. Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Assistant Prof. Department of Accounting, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

3 Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman,, Iran

10.22034/iaar.2023.185375

Abstract

Among the goals of managers is to maximize the wealth of shareholders and reduce the capital cost. In this regard, deciding on the capital structure is one of the most important strategies to achieve these goals. Since, Board of directors is one of the main decision-making groups in in this field. Therefore, the relationships that can be seen in the form of a social network between the board members of different companies, the purpose of this study is to examine the capital cost and the capital structure in the relations network of the board of directors of companies in the Iranian stock market and is based on data related to 115 companies in the period 2012-2020. Network analysis and regression analysis were used to conduct research tests. Findings showed that in the communication network of companies, some of them are in a better position and have more access and effectiveness. Better location can lead to easier access to information and resources faster. Also, the results of testing the hypotheses showed that there is no significant relationship between the betweenness centrality, and the capital cost and the capital structure. But there is a significant negative relationship between the closeness centrality, and the capital cost and capital structure, and a significant positive relationship between the degree centrality and the capital cost and the capital structure. In other words, it can be said that the position in the structure of relationships can somehow affect the capital cost of companies and their capital structure.

Keywords


  1. اسلامی بیدگلی، غلامرضا؛ جولا، جعفر. (1389). "بررسی رابطه ساختار سرمایه با ریسک سیستماتیک شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران". فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 2(8)، 91-113.
  2. انصاری، عبدالمهدی؛ صفری بیدسکان، سعید. (1391). "بررسی تاثیرپذیری هزینه سرمایه از اهرم عملیاتی و اهرم مالی". مجله پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی، 3(13)، 33-46.
  3. باستانی، سوسن؛ رئیسی، مهین. (1390). "روش تحلیل شبکه: استفاده از رویکرد شبکه‌های کل در مطالعه اجتماعات متن باز". مجله مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، 2، 31-57.
  4. تقی‌زاده، رضا؛ ناظمی، امین. (1397). "تحلیل شبکه مالکیت در بازار سهام ایران". مجله دانش حسابداری، 9 (3)، 115-144.
  5. رهنما، فاطمه؛ بادآور نهندی، یونس. (1398). "تاثیر نرخ موثر مالیاتی بر ساختار سرمایه، تصمیمات سرمایه‌گذاری و سود تقسیمی سهام". تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، انجمن حسابداری ایران، 42، 193-210.
  6. صالحی، مهدی؛ بیرامی، لاله؛ هشیار، رحمان؛ بیرامی، وحید. (1395). عوامل موثر بر هزینه سرمایه با تاکید بر کیفیت حسابرسی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه سیاست‌های مالی و اقتصادی، 15، 135-158.
  7. کاشانی‌پور، محمد؛ رحمانی، محمد؛ کاظمی، مهدی. (1398). "تبیین اثر پویایی ساختار سرمایه، سودآوری و ارزش افزوده اقتصادی بر EPS شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران". تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، انجمن حسابداری ایران، 41، 5-20.
  8. وکیلی فرد، حمیدرضا؛ ثنایی، غلامرضا؛ احمدی لویه، افشین. (1397). "اثر ساختار سرمایه بر هزینه سرمایه، خالص جریان‌های نقدی و ارزش بازار بانک‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران". مطالعات حسابداری و حسابرسی، انجمن حسابداری ایران، 25، 35-48.
  9. Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). "Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks". Journal of Informetrics, 6(3): 403-412.‏
  10. Abell, P., & Nisar, T. M. (2007). “Performance effects of venture capital firm networks”. Management Decision, 45(5), 923–936.
  11. Aleenajitpong, N., & Leemakdej, A. (2021). "Venture Capital Networks in Southeast Asia: Network characteristics and cohesive subgroups". International Review of Financial Analysis, 101752.
  12. An, P., Zhou, J., Li, H., Sun, B., & Shi, Y. (2018). "The evolutionary similarity of the co-shareholder relationship network from institutional and non-institutional shareholder perspectives". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 503: 439–450.
  13. Ballester, L., González-Urteaga, A., & Martínez, B. (2020). "The role of internal corporate governance mechanisms on default risk: A systematic review for different institutional settings". Research in International Business and Finance, 54: 101293.
  14. Ferris, S.P., Javakhadze, D. and Rajkovic, T. (2017), “The international effect of managerial social capital on the cost of equity”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 74, 69-84.
  15. Gan, L., Lv, W., & Chen, Y. (2020). "Capital structure adjustment speed over the business cycle". Finance Research Letters, 101574.
  16. García, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2021). “Female directors, capital structure, and financial distress”. Journal of Business Research, 136, 592-601.
  17. Goncalves, A. F., Rossoni, L., & Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2018). "Board social capital reduces implied cost of capital for private companies but not of state-owned companies". Management Decision.
  18. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). “Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance”. Author(s): Source The Journal of Finance, 62(1).
  19. Huang, W. Q., Zhuang, X. T., & Yao, S. (2009). "A network analysis of the Chinese stock market". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(14): 2956-2964.‏
  20. Huang, Y., & Yan, C. (2020). "Global accounting standards, financial statement comparability, and the cost of capital". International Review of Economics & Finance.
  21. Jin, Y., Zhang, Q., & Li, S. P. (2016). “Topological properties and community detection of venture capital network: Evidence from China”. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 442, 300–311.
  22. Jin, Y., Zhang, Q., Shan, L., & Li, S. P. (2015). “Characteristics of venture capital network and its correlation with regional economy: Evidence from China”. PLoS One, 10(9), e0137172.
  23. Joni, J., Ahmed, K., & Hamilton, J. (2019). "Politically connected boards, family and business group affiliations, and cost of capital: Evidence from Indonesia". The British Accounting Review, 100878.
  24. Karanovic, G., & Gjosevska, B. (2012). "Application of Fuzzy Logic in Determining Cost of Capital for the Capital Budgeting Process". Procedia Economics and Finance, 3: 78–83.
  25. Kim, H.-S. (2020). "Risk management and optimal capital structure under ambiguity". Finance Research Letters, 101752.
  26. Kling, G., Volz, U., Murinde, V., & Ayas, S. (2021). "The impact of climate vulnerability on firms’ cost of capital and access to finance". World Development, 137: 105131.
  27. Liu, H., Chiang, Y.-M., & Tsai, H.-J. (2020). "The impact of loan rollover restrictions on capital structure adjustments, leverage deviations, and firm values". Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 101384.
  28. Liu, Z., & Zhan, L. (2010). “Do venture capital networks really work in China?. In Management and Service Science (MASS)”. 2010 International Conference on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  29. Mas, D., Vignes, A., & Weisbuch, G. (2007). “Networks and syndication strategies: Does a venture capitalist need to be in the center?” ERMESCNRS Universite Pantheon Assas Paris II(No. 07-14). Working Paper.
  30. Moebert, J & Tydecks, P. (2007). "Power and Ownership Structures among German Companies, A Network Analysis of Financial Linkages Darmstadt discussion papers in economics 179". Working Paper econstor.eu/handle/10419/32056.
  31. Park, S. S., & Pyun, J. H. (2020). “Between two extreme practices of rent-only and deposit-only leases in Korea: Default risk vs. cost of capital”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 85: 103578.
  32. Rossoni, L. and Mendes-Da-Silva, C.L. (2018), “How does legitimacy operate in emerging capital markets? Investigating the moderating effects of premium listings and firm size on risk”. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 36(3), 404-417.
  33. Sankowska, A., & Siudak, D. (2016). "The small world phenomenon and assortative mixing in Polish corporate board and director networks". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 443: 309-315.‏
  34. Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). "Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India". Journal of World Business, 52(5): 615-627.‏
  35. Taghizadeh, R., Nazemi, A., & Sadeghzadeh Maharluie, M. (2019). "Analyzing Shareholder Network in the Tehran Stock Exchange". Iranian Journal of Finance, 3(4): 113-134.
  36. Taghizadeh, R., Nazemi, A., & Sadeghzadeh Maharluie, M. (2021). "Network Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships in Tehran Stock Exchange". Advances in Mathematical Finance & Applications, 6(1): 49-61.
  37. Vo, M. T. (2021). "Capital structure and cost of capital when prices affect real investments". Journal of Economics and Business. 113: 105944.
  38. Vogel, H. A. (2019). “Capital structure, capital cost, and capital productivity”. Foundations of Airport Economics and Finance, 105-113.
  39. Wellman, B. (1998). "Structural Analysis: Form method and Metapher to theory and substance". In structural analysis: a network approach, Cambridge University.
  40. Withers, M., Kim, J. Y. R., & Howard, M. (2018). "The evolution of the board interlock network following Sarbanes-Oxley". Social Networks, 52: 56-67.‏
  41. Yeh, C. C., Lin, F., Wang, T. S., & Wu, C. M. (2020). “Does corporate social responsibility affect cost of capital in China?” Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(1), 1-12.